Bayesian integration of flux tower data into process-based simulator for quantifying uncertainty in simulated output

Parameters of a process-based forest growth simulator are difficult or impossible to obtain from field observations. Reliable estimates can, however, be obtained using calibration against observations of output and state variables. In this study, we present a Bayesian framework to calibrate the wide...

Mô tả chi tiết

Lưu vào:
Hiển thị chi tiết
Tác giả chính: Rahul, Raj
Định dạng: BB
Ngôn ngữ:eng
Thông tin xuất bản: 2020
Chủ đề:
Truy cập trực tuyến:http://tailieuso.tlu.edu.vn/handle/DHTL/4491
Từ khóa: Thêm từ khóa bạn đọc
Không có từ khóa, Hãy là người đầu tiên gắn từ khóa cho biểu ghi này!
id oai:localhost:DHTL-4491
record_format dspace
spelling oai:localhost:DHTL-44912020-03-30T02:14:13Z Bayesian integration of flux tower data into process-based simulator for quantifying uncertainty in simulated output Rahul, Raj Uncertainty estimation Bayesian calibration Gross primary production BIOME-BGC Process-based simulator Parameters of a process-based forest growth simulator are difficult or impossible to obtain from field observations. Reliable estimates can, however, be obtained using calibration against observations of output and state variables. In this study, we present a Bayesian framework to calibrate the widely used process-based simulator BIOME-BGC against estimates of gross 5 primary production (GPP) data. We used GPP partitioned from flux tower measurements of a net ecosystem exchange over a 55 year old Douglas fir stand as an example. The uncertainties of both the BIOME-BGC parameters and the simulated GPP were estimated. The calibrated parameters leaf and fine root turnover (LFRT), ratio of fine root carbon to leaf carbon (FRC:LC), ratio of carbon to nitrogen in leaf (C:Nleaf), canopy water interception coefficient (Wint), fraction of leaf nitrogen in Rubisco (FLNR), and soil rooting depth (SD) characterize the photosynthesis and carbon and nitrogen allocation in the 10 forest. The calibration improved the root mean square error and enhanced Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency between simulated and flux tower daily GPP compared to the uncalibrated BIOME-BGC. Nevertheless, the seasonal cycle for flux tower GPP was not reproduced exactly, and some overestimate in spring and underestimates in summer remained after calibration. Further analysis showed that, although simulated GPP was time dependent due to carbon allocation, it still followed the variability of the meteorological forcing closely. We hypothesized that the phenology exhibited a seasonal cycle that was not accurately 15 reproduced by the simulator. We investigated this by allowing the parameter values to vary month-by-month. https://www.geosci-model-dev-discuss.net/gmd-2016-216/gmd-2016-216.pdf 2020-02-18T02:25:33Z 2020-02-18T02:25:33Z 2014 20181122165324.0 130605s2014 BB http://tailieuso.tlu.edu.vn/handle/DHTL/4491 eng In: Geoscientific Model Development(2016)IN PRESS, 32 p
institution Trường Đại học Thủy Lợi
collection DSpace
language eng
topic Uncertainty estimation
Bayesian calibration
Gross primary production
BIOME-BGC
Process-based simulator
spellingShingle Uncertainty estimation
Bayesian calibration
Gross primary production
BIOME-BGC
Process-based simulator
Rahul, Raj
Bayesian integration of flux tower data into process-based simulator for quantifying uncertainty in simulated output
description Parameters of a process-based forest growth simulator are difficult or impossible to obtain from field observations. Reliable estimates can, however, be obtained using calibration against observations of output and state variables. In this study, we present a Bayesian framework to calibrate the widely used process-based simulator BIOME-BGC against estimates of gross 5 primary production (GPP) data. We used GPP partitioned from flux tower measurements of a net ecosystem exchange over a 55 year old Douglas fir stand as an example. The uncertainties of both the BIOME-BGC parameters and the simulated GPP were estimated. The calibrated parameters leaf and fine root turnover (LFRT), ratio of fine root carbon to leaf carbon (FRC:LC), ratio of carbon to nitrogen in leaf (C:Nleaf), canopy water interception coefficient (Wint), fraction of leaf nitrogen in Rubisco (FLNR), and soil rooting depth (SD) characterize the photosynthesis and carbon and nitrogen allocation in the 10 forest. The calibration improved the root mean square error and enhanced Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency between simulated and flux tower daily GPP compared to the uncalibrated BIOME-BGC. Nevertheless, the seasonal cycle for flux tower GPP was not reproduced exactly, and some overestimate in spring and underestimates in summer remained after calibration. Further analysis showed that, although simulated GPP was time dependent due to carbon allocation, it still followed the variability of the meteorological forcing closely. We hypothesized that the phenology exhibited a seasonal cycle that was not accurately 15 reproduced by the simulator. We investigated this by allowing the parameter values to vary month-by-month.
format BB
author Rahul, Raj
author_facet Rahul, Raj
author_sort Rahul, Raj
title Bayesian integration of flux tower data into process-based simulator for quantifying uncertainty in simulated output
title_short Bayesian integration of flux tower data into process-based simulator for quantifying uncertainty in simulated output
title_full Bayesian integration of flux tower data into process-based simulator for quantifying uncertainty in simulated output
title_fullStr Bayesian integration of flux tower data into process-based simulator for quantifying uncertainty in simulated output
title_full_unstemmed Bayesian integration of flux tower data into process-based simulator for quantifying uncertainty in simulated output
title_sort bayesian integration of flux tower data into process-based simulator for quantifying uncertainty in simulated output
publishDate 2020
url http://tailieuso.tlu.edu.vn/handle/DHTL/4491
work_keys_str_mv AT rahulraj bayesianintegrationoffluxtowerdataintoprocessbasedsimulatorforquantifyinguncertaintyinsimulatedoutput
_version_ 1768590451798966272